October 21, 2010

Ten Douchebagettes.

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jim @ 4:54 pm


Definitely. each warrants a score of 10 on the pukeworthy scale.


  1. I have several more I could add to that list.

    Comment by Yabu — October 21, 2010 @ 5:46 pm

  2. I agree. That list is way too small, but the choices are definitely appropriate.

    Comment by CharlieDelta — October 21, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

  3. I also agree the list is way to small, but anyway I would love to sucker punch every one of those assholes.

    Comment by chef of da future — October 21, 2010 @ 7:41 pm

  4. Hillary looks like she was in the cloak room & got a mouthful!

    Comment by dudley1 — October 21, 2010 @ 9:46 pm

  5. What they say is ugly, ridiculous and untrue. They are filled with hate and angst. What they look like is completely irrelevant. Women, more so than men, are always judged first on their appearance, and that weakens the opponent’s argument whether it is liberals making Condi Rice into a Mammy figure or conservatives going after Whoopi. How is calling someone a douche bag (for vaginal cleaning) different than calling someone a tea bagger, a homosexual act?

    Comment by Norma — October 22, 2010 @ 8:43 am

  6. What? Just a few super-tolerant liberal women speaking their minds.

    Comment by sheri — October 22, 2010 @ 9:39 am

  7. I agree with Norma. They should be ridiculed for their views, not their appearance. Also, I don’t want to be dragged into a “you’re ugly and your mother dresses you funny” style argument. It’s more appropriate comming from the left (and Jr. High kids).

    Comment by dan — October 22, 2010 @ 12:35 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress